Shakespeare's The Tempest: UPSC Solved PYQ

How do post-colonial critics view Prospero’s use of magic and exploitation of Caliban?

Post-colonial critics analyze "The Tempest" by William Shakespeare through the lens of colonialism and the complex dynamics of power, exploitation, and cultural domination. Prospero's use of magic and his relationship with Caliban are central to these critiques. Prospero, the exiled Duke of Milan, who assumes control over the island, represents European colonial power. His magic is symbolic of the technological and intellectual superiority claimed by colonizers to justify their domination over indigenous populations.

Caliban, often interpreted as the native inhabitant of the island, embodies the colonized subject. He is subjected to Prospero’s authority and magic, which can be seen as a metaphor for the colonizers’ imposition of their will upon the colonized. Prospero’s control over Caliban is not just physical but also psychological, as he uses his magic to dominate and dehumanize Caliban, reducing him to a mere servant.

Post-colonial critics argue that Caliban's portrayal as monstrous and uncivilized reflects the colonial ideology that deems indigenous peoples as inferior and in need of European governance and enlightenment. This perspective is reinforced by Caliban’s language acquisition, which Prospero sees as a civilizing mission, but Caliban experiences as a tool of his subjugation. Caliban’s line, "You taught me language; and my profit on't / Is, I know how to curse," highlights the coercive nature of Prospero's education, which strips Caliban of his cultural identity while failing to acknowledge his humanity.

Prospero’s exploitation of Caliban extends to the economic realm, as he commands Caliban to perform menial tasks, reflecting the exploitative labor systems imposed on colonized peoples. Caliban’s resistance, through curses and attempts to reclaim the island, can be interpreted as acts of defiance against colonial oppression.

Moreover, Prospero's treatment of Caliban is often juxtaposed with his treatment of Ariel, a spirit who serves Prospero willingly in exchange for the promise of freedom. This contrast further underscores the dynamics of power and control; Ariel’s servitude is based on a negotiated agreement, whereas Caliban's is enforced through coercion and violence. This differential treatment highlights the arbitrary and discriminatory nature of colonial rule, which favors some subjects over others based on their perceived usefulness and compliance.

Post-colonial readings also examine the play’s ending, where Prospero renounces his magic and seeks reconciliation. Critics debate whether this represents a genuine renunciation of colonial power or merely a strategic retreat. Prospero's return to Europe and the restoration of his dukedom do not necessarily equate to liberation for Caliban, who remains on the island. Thus, the resolution might reflect the complexities and unresolved tensions of colonial relationships.

In summary, post-colonial critics view Prospero's use of magic and exploitation of Caliban as emblematic of the broader mechanisms of colonialism, where the colonizer imposes control through superior knowledge and force, dehumanizes the native population, and exploits their labor. Caliban's resistance, though often portrayed as futile, symbolizes the enduring struggle of the colonized against imperial domination.

Enroll in our UGC NET English Online Course

Explore all our courses HERE

Follow us:

YouTube: @TheAnkitaJain

Instagram: @theankita.jain

Telegram: The Ankita Jain (for UGC NET English Coaching)

WhatsApp: Ankita Jain