There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
| Item Details | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Matthew Arnold’s essay “The Study of Poetry” is one of the most important works of literary criticism in English literature. In this essay, Arnold explains why poetry is important, how it should be judged, and what role it should play in human life, especially in the modern world. His central argument is that poetry is not just a form of entertainment, but a serious and essential guide to life. Arnold believes that as traditional sources of belief such as religion and philosophy lose their authority, poetry will become even more important because it can offer moral guidance, emotional strength, and a sense of meaning.
Arnold begins by expressing his strong faith in the future of poetry. He argues that poetry has a very high destiny because it speaks to deep human needs. According to him, people once relied heavily on religion, customs, and social traditions to understand life and make sense of the world. However, in the modern age, many of these beliefs are being questioned. Scientific discoveries, historical criticism, and social change have weakened people’s faith in traditional religious and moral systems. Arnold does not celebrate this change, but he recognizes it as a reality of modern life.
In this situation, Arnold believes poetry will take on a new and more serious role. Poetry, he argues, can replace what religion and philosophy once provided. It can offer comfort, wisdom, and guidance without depending on fixed dogmas or questionable facts. Poetry, according to Arnold, deals not with literal truth, but with truth of experience and emotion. Because of this, it can continue to speak to people even when other belief systems fail.
Arnold famously describes poetry as a “criticism of life.” By this, he does not mean that poetry criticizes life in a negative way. Instead, he means that poetry helps us understand life, judge it, and respond to it thoughtfully. Good poetry presents life truthfully and seriously. It helps readers see the world clearly and feel deeply. For Arnold, poetry combines truth and beauty in a way that no other form of knowledge can.
One of Arnold’s most important arguments is that poetry should be judged by its content rather than by its historical background or personal details about the poet. He criticizes critics who focus too much on the poet’s life, the time period, or the circumstances in which a poem was written. While these factors may be interesting, Arnold believes they distract from what truly matters: the quality of the poetry itself.
Arnold argues that the value of poetry lies in its “matter and substance,” not in its form alone. By “matter,” he means the seriousness and truth of what the poem says about life. A poem may be technically clever or emotionally exciting, but if it lacks depth or truth, it cannot be considered great poetry. For Arnold, great poetry must deal with important human concerns such as love, suffering, morality, duty, and human destiny.
This leads Arnold to distinguish between what he calls “true poetry” and “inferior poetry.” Inferior poetry may be attractive or entertaining, but it lacks seriousness. It may focus on trivial subjects or rely too heavily on decoration and style. True poetry, on the other hand, has moral and intellectual depth. It helps readers grow as human beings.
Arnold is especially concerned with how readers and critics judge poetry. He believes that many people admire poems for the wrong reasons, such as national pride, personal taste, or historical importance. For example, people may praise a poet simply because he belongs to their country or because he was influential in his time. Arnold argues that this kind of judgment is misleading and unhelpful.
To address this problem, Arnold introduces his famous “touchstone method.” This method involves comparing passages from a poem with short passages from the greatest poets, such as Homer, Dante, Shakespeare, and Milton. These great lines serve as “touchstones,” or standards, by which other poetry can be judged. If a poem can stand comparison with these great works in terms of seriousness, truth, and beauty, then it deserves high praise. If it cannot, then its value should be questioned.
Arnold believes this method helps readers develop a more reliable sense of judgment. Instead of relying on personal preference or cultural bias, readers learn to recognize true poetic excellence by comparison. The touchstone method, therefore, trains the reader’s taste and encourages humility and honesty in criticism.
Another important argument in the essay concerns Arnold’s view of the Romantic poets. While Arnold respects poets like Wordsworth, Shelley, and Keats, he does not consider all of their work equally great. He criticizes Wordsworth, in particular, for writing too much poetry of uneven quality. Arnold believes that Wordsworth often wrote on trivial subjects and produced lines that lack poetic power. However, Arnold still considers Wordsworth a great poet because at his best, he expressed profound moral ideas and deep insight into human nature.
This shows that Arnold does not believe a poet should be judged by their weakest work, but neither should their weaker poems be praised simply because they were written by a great poet. Consistency and seriousness matter. A great poet, in Arnold’s view, is one who repeatedly expresses deep truth and high moral insight.
Arnold also warns against judging poetry by purely intellectual or scientific standards. He argues that poetry should not be confused with philosophy or science. Science seeks factual truth, while poetry seeks emotional and moral truth. Poetry does not explain the world through logical arguments or evidence. Instead, it presents ideas through imagination, feeling, and language. For Arnold, this makes poetry uniquely powerful.
At the same time, Arnold insists that poetry must not be vague or emotionally empty. He criticizes poetry that focuses only on personal feelings without offering insight into life. True poetry, he argues, balances emotion with thought. It speaks to both the heart and the mind.
Arnold’s essay also reflects his belief in cultural improvement. He sees poetry as a means of educating society and improving moral standards. He believes that exposure to great poetry can refine people’s emotions, sharpen their understanding, and encourage ethical reflection. In this sense, poetry plays a social role as well as a personal one.
Throughout the essay, Arnold emphasizes the seriousness of poetry’s task. He believes that poetry should not aim merely to amuse or distract. Instead, it should engage with the deepest questions of human existence. Poetry, for Arnold, is a source of wisdom and consolation. It helps people endure suffering, confront loss, and find meaning in life.
Arnold’s argument is deeply shaped by the Victorian context in which he lived. The nineteenth century was a time of rapid scientific and social change. Traditional religious beliefs were being challenged by new ideas such as evolution and historical criticism of the Bible. Arnold saw poetry as a way to preserve moral and spiritual values in a changing world. While modern readers may not fully accept his belief that poetry can replace religion, his emphasis on the ethical and emotional power of literature remains influential.
In conclusion, “The Study of Poetry” presents Matthew Arnold’s vision of poetry as a serious, moral, and life-shaping force. He argues that poetry will become increasingly important as traditional belief systems decline. He insists that poetry should be judged by its truth, seriousness, and moral depth rather than by historical or personal factors. Through the touchstone method, he offers a practical way of evaluating poetic quality. Above all, Arnold believes that great poetry helps people understand life and live it more fully.
Arnold’s essay remains significant because it raises fundamental questions about why literature matters and how it should be read. Even today, his insistence that poetry is not just decoration but a powerful way of engaging with life continues to shape literary criticism and education.
Arnold, M. (1880). The Study of Poetry. In Essays in Criticism. Macmillan. Arnold, M. (1964). Essays in Criticism: First Series. Macmillan.
Daiches, D. (1960). A Critical History of English Literature. Allied Publishers.
Wimsatt, W. K., & Brooks, C. (1957). Literary Criticism: A Short History. Knopf.
Abrams, M. H. (1999). The Norton Glossary of Literary Terms. Norton.
Prasad, B. (2005). A Background to the Study of English Literature. Macmillan.
Cuddon, J. A. (2013). Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
Habib, M. A. R. (2005). A History of Literary Criticism. Blackwell.
Answer: B
Answer: C
Answer: B
Answer: C
Answer: B
Answer: D
Answer: C
Answer: C
Answer: C
Answer: C